Skip to main content

Sentence Fragments and Independent Clauses

All sentences should be able to stand by themselves. A complete sentence has a subject and a verb, and optionally an object. Sentence fragments fail in this sense in that they lack one or the other. Fragments are a grammatical error.

Usually fragments are those thoughts, which got disconnected from the main sentence, and stands out all by themselves. But it is correct only in cases when the fragments are powerful enough to stand alone and convey a logical meaning. Usually such fragments are encountered in fiction writing.

She felt she never encountered such drastic situation. Never.

In this sentence, ‘Never’ stands out as a sentence. It’s a fragment. It is however correct to put such fragments when they are very small and can mostly convey a logical meaning. But in cases where the fragments are larger, with more than two words, it is apt to rewrite them. For instance:

Anoop has three brothers. Ajay, Vijay, and Vimal. All of them are doctors now. Well settled in the US with their families.

In this sentence, there are two fragments: “Ajay, Vijay, and Vimal” and “Well settled in the US with their families.” So, it is most appropriate to rewrite this sentence in the following form:

Anoop has three brothers, Ajay, Vijay, and Vimal, and all of them are doctors. They are well settled in the US with their families.

Sentences should convey complete thoughts. Fragments are incomplete thoughts. For instance, “Ajay, Vijay, and Vimal” is an incomplete thought; so is “well settled in the US with families.” Using sentence fragments is a grammatical error as well as a stylistic mistake. Good writers should avoid using fragments and use independent clauses instead.

Independent Clause

An independent clause is part of a sentence, which can itself stand as a standalone sentence, unlike a sentence fragment. For instance:

John is a doctor, and he cured Eric’s disease.

Here, “John is a doctor” is the independent clause (which means it can be written as a separate sentence and would convey a complete thought). So is “he cured Eric’s disease, but not “and he cured Eric’s disease.” Without ‘and’ there in between, the whole sentence is a comma splice (or a run-on sentence, if without comma too), which is a grammatical mistake. We cannot have two independent clauses in a single sentence, so we make one of the clauses dependent on the other (using a conjunction). So, “and he cured Eric’s disease” is a dependent clause.

The trick is to write a clause as a separate sentence and see if it completes a thought or not. If it doesn’t it is a fragment or a dependent clause.

John is a doctor. (Complete thought)

He cured Eric’s disease. (Complete thought)

And he cured Eric’s disease. (Incomplete thought or sentence fragment)

Addition of ‘and’ makes the second sentence dependent on the first. Such dependent clauses are also called subordinate clauses.

Writing subordinate clauses as independent sentences is not a mistake at all. It’s only regarded as a bad style of writing. But Ernest Hemingway is known to begin his sentences with ‘and’. That doesn’t mean that he is a bad writer. We can only conclude that each writer has his/her own style, which is unique.

Copyright © Lenin Nair 2008


  1. DoshDosh's first comment is this. Thank you a lot for your views. Thanks also, John.

  2. Wow, I believe your greatest merit is your simplicity. This is best if you post simple humble posts with full good help for writers like this. Most I guess are very poor in grammar. That makes your blog big.

  3. In order to fight fragments, most word processors like MS word for instance have built in code. It alerts u of the fragments, good post!

  4. Sentence fragments as they are applicable to various contexts should be well debated. I guess as you said, they are no mistakes. But it is up to the writer to make his writing clutter-free by editing out all the fragments


  5. Very informative and interesting, was looking for such a blog


Post a Comment

Comments are moderated very strictly

Popular posts from this blog

What Is the Difference Between Hardcover and Paperback?

Today, my reader, Rahman contacted me with a doubt:

Dear Lenin, would you explain why there are two types of books: hardcover and paperback?
This is quite a simple affair and there are explanatory articles to be found at various places on the Net. Here is my addition.


A hardcover aka hardback is a book bound with thick protective cover, with usually a paper or leather dust jacket over the main cover. The aim of hardcover is protection and durability. These books are mainly for long-term use and collectors’ editions. Hardcover books last far longer than the corresponding paperbacks. They do not get damaged easily thus making them perfect for reference guides, great literary works, etc.

In addition, there is a difference in the type of paper used to print hardcover books. The paper used is long-lasting acid-free type. Acid-free paper has a pH value of 7 (neutral) which makes it highly durable. The papers are stitched and glued to the spine.

Hardbacks are prepared for commercial …

En Dash, Em Dash, and Hyphen

We have three types of dashes in use: The hyphen, En Dash, and the Em Dash. In this post, we will see how to use them all correctly.

Hyphen (-)

The hyphen is the minus key in Windows-based keyboards. This is a widely used punctuation mark. Hyphen should not be mistaken for a dash. Dash is different and has different function than a hyphen.

A hyphen is used to separate the words in a compound adjective, verb, or adverb. For instance:

The T-rex has a movement-based vision.
My blog is blogger-powered.
John’s idea was pooh-poohed.

The hyphen can be used generally for all kinds of wordbreaks.

En Dash (–)

En Dash gets its name from its length. It is one ‘N’ long (En is a typographical unit that is almost as wide as 'N'). En Dash is used to express a range of values or a distance:

People of age 55–80 are more prone to hypertension.
Delhi–Sidney flight was late by three hours.

In MS Word, you can put an En Dash either from the menu, clicking Insert->Symbol or by the key-combination, Ctrl + Num…

What Is the Meaning of the Word 'Ghajini'? Story and Trivia of Aamir Khan's New Film [Special]

[Special Entry]

Aamir Khan's latest film is titled a little weirdly for the taste of Hindi filmgoers. 'Ghajini': They have never heard of such a name, and such a word never existed in Hindi or in any other Indian language.

The name Ghajini is the name of the villain of the film. In Tamil version, the name of the villain was Laxman.

As a Tamil moviegoer, I have already watched Ghajini and know the story in full.

So, What Does the Title Mean?

In Tamil, the title of the film is inspired by the story of Mahmud of Ghazni, an ancient invader of India. This person was so persistent in invading India that he continued trying after several failures. In the film too, the protagonist is such persistent in finding out and killing the villain of the film, who had killed his girlfriend, Kalpana (played by Asin). Aamir's Character (named Sanjay Ramaswamy in Tamil), is a short-term amnesiac, who cannot remember anything more than fifteen minutes.

You may ask then how the Ghazni became…