Skip to main content

Sentence Fragments and Independent Clauses

All sentences should be able to stand by themselves. A complete sentence has a subject and a verb, and optionally an object. Sentence fragments fail in this sense in that they lack one or the other. Fragments are a grammatical error.

Usually fragments are those thoughts, which got disconnected from the main sentence, and stands out all by themselves. But it is correct only in cases when the fragments are powerful enough to stand alone and convey a logical meaning. Usually such fragments are encountered in fiction writing.

She felt she never encountered such drastic situation. Never.

In this sentence, ‘Never’ stands out as a sentence. It’s a fragment. It is however correct to put such fragments when they are very small and can mostly convey a logical meaning. But in cases where the fragments are larger, with more than two words, it is apt to rewrite them. For instance:

Anoop has three brothers. Ajay, Vijay, and Vimal. All of them are doctors now. Well settled in the US with their families.

In this sentence, there are two fragments: “Ajay, Vijay, and Vimal” and “Well settled in the US with their families.” So, it is most appropriate to rewrite this sentence in the following form:

Anoop has three brothers, Ajay, Vijay, and Vimal, and all of them are doctors. They are well settled in the US with their families.

Sentences should convey complete thoughts. Fragments are incomplete thoughts. For instance, “Ajay, Vijay, and Vimal” is an incomplete thought; so is “well settled in the US with families.” Using sentence fragments is a grammatical error as well as a stylistic mistake. Good writers should avoid using fragments and use independent clauses instead.

Independent Clause

An independent clause is part of a sentence, which can itself stand as a standalone sentence, unlike a sentence fragment. For instance:

John is a doctor, and he cured Eric’s disease.

Here, “John is a doctor” is the independent clause (which means it can be written as a separate sentence and would convey a complete thought). So is “he cured Eric’s disease, but not “and he cured Eric’s disease.” Without ‘and’ there in between, the whole sentence is a comma splice (or a run-on sentence, if without comma too), which is a grammatical mistake. We cannot have two independent clauses in a single sentence, so we make one of the clauses dependent on the other (using a conjunction). So, “and he cured Eric’s disease” is a dependent clause.

The trick is to write a clause as a separate sentence and see if it completes a thought or not. If it doesn’t it is a fragment or a dependent clause.

John is a doctor. (Complete thought)

He cured Eric’s disease. (Complete thought)

And he cured Eric’s disease. (Incomplete thought or sentence fragment)

Addition of ‘and’ makes the second sentence dependent on the first. Such dependent clauses are also called subordinate clauses.

Writing subordinate clauses as independent sentences is not a mistake at all. It’s only regarded as a bad style of writing. But Ernest Hemingway is known to begin his sentences with ‘and’. That doesn’t mean that he is a bad writer. We can only conclude that each writer has his/her own style, which is unique.

Copyright © Lenin Nair 2008


  1. DoshDosh's first comment is this. Thank you a lot for your views. Thanks also, John.

  2. Wow, I believe your greatest merit is your simplicity. This is best if you post simple humble posts with full good help for writers like this. Most I guess are very poor in grammar. That makes your blog big.

  3. In order to fight fragments, most word processors like MS word for instance have built in code. It alerts u of the fragments, good post!

  4. Sentence fragments as they are applicable to various contexts should be well debated. I guess as you said, they are no mistakes. But it is up to the writer to make his writing clutter-free by editing out all the fragments


  5. Very informative and interesting, was looking for such a blog


Post a Comment

Comments are moderated very strictly

Popular posts from this blog

Power of Short Sentences

Post dedicated to Thomas Hardy (see History Today below). There are monster sentences like the one you encounter as the first paragraph of Oliver Twist by Charles Dickens . One of my friends, whom I am getting equipped for his IELTS ( what is this? ), told me that the examination recommends long sentences. In writing classes also, I guess it’s longer sentences most tutors promote. But indubitably shorter sentences are more powerful . We will see why. Take a long sentence for instance: Tom Cruise, one of the finest actors in the whole world, is perhaps the most powerful celebrity to exist ever according to Time Magazine, but many people still dispute this fact and point out that there are more powerful and popular actors than Cruise, though they were unsuccessful in providing the total number of fans, who liked the films of those actors. This is a long sentence and it is very confusing . Though it has a logical construction and conveys a meaning, it falters in many occasions and seems

Creative Writing: Crafting Characters With Emotional Appeal in Mind

When you read the greatest fiction works ever, have you ever asked what was so compelling about them that you not only kept reading it, but you ended up reading all other major works of the writer? It may well be because the writer touched your emotional quotient quite a bit. Every reader has a unique taste . Some like to read suspense thrillers , some tender love stories, and some others dark horror and bloodshed stories . That’s why there are all sorts of genres out there. When a writer gives you what exactly you want, you will keep reading. Here we come to the emotional appeal. Character Imperfection Perfect characters may not always be the upshot of a writer’s deliberation. It may well be due to ignorance . Usually the upcoming writers take it for granted that if they create perfect characters, they will be able to garner a bigger audience . It is not true. You have to ask yourself what a character would do in a particular situation. Perfect characters—perfect gunmen, perfect

Another Tiny List of Confusables

Earlier, you may remember we published a list of confusable words . Here we are again, with such a list of words. Abjure/Adjure: Abjure means "to formally renounce (give up) something" such as a position. Adjure on the other hand means 'to appeal to' or 'solemnly order'. The governor decided to abjure his position due to political pressure. Normally, adjuring to the subordinates doesn't give many results. Amount/Number: Use amount when you have uncountable subject. Use number when it is countable. The amount of love one gets depends on the number of friends one has. Appraise/Apprise: Appraise is the word applied to quantitative evaluation of something. Apprise means 'communicate' or 'inform'. Appraising diamonds is the work of an expert. Joe apprised me of the schedule of events. Attorney/Lawyer/Solicitor: These terms are highly misinterpreted and confused by many people. Let me clarify. In the US, an attorney is any member