Skip to main content

Some English Errors to Avoid

Here are some of the English errors new writers and students often come across. English is a difficult language to learn if you don’t put your mind to it. However, by working hard and putting efforts, you can improve very well. Read these common errors, and let me know your ideas, suggestions, and doubts if any.

  1. When we talk about uncountable nouns, use singular verb. For example:

The sceneries in Kerala are very nice.” This is a wrong sentence. It should be: “The scenery in Kerala is very good.”

Just like this, always use these words in singular form only: furniture, news, trouble, poor, the blind, baggage, luggage, poetry, female, etc. The list can be quite expansive. Here are some example sentences:

The old furniture in the home was to be removed.

You should take trouble to bring her home.

He feeds the poor on his birthday every year.

The baggage contained nothing suspicious.

  1. Noun Agreement: Noun always agrees with the verb. This means, a singular noun takes a singular verb and plural one takes plural. Here are some tips. When we use terms like each, every, any, much, etc., we have to use singular verbs. These elements make the nouns they modify singular. For instance:

Each of the students has to pass the eligibility exam.

Much of the wine was drunk on the way.

But the words like all, many, etc., use plural agreement:

Many people are attending the meeting.

All students have submitted the report.

  1. I or Me, which is correct? We say usually, “Hey, it’s me!” Though in colloquial sense this is perfectly acceptable, the correct usage is “Hey, it’s I!” (when I is the subject) You know why? Consider this:

When we refer to somebody, we say, “It’s she” (subjective form) not “It’s her” (objective). But there is a particular situation when it is correct to use “It’s her.” When?

“Whom did he hurt?”

“It’s her” or “It’s me” In this situation, the objective sense is required. Hence, the sentences are correct.

See the difference? When the object of hurt is asked for, we give it through the sentence, “It’s me” but when you are the subject yourself, you have to say, “It’s I”

“Who is it?”

“It’s I”

“It’s he”

“It’s she”


“It’s Tim”

This confusion arises mainly because the statement using proper nouns (Tim, Jack, Sarah, etc.,) do not have any issue with this. And the sentences with third person pronouns are usually not incorrectly used (we may not say “It’s her”). But when we use first person, the mistake arises due to the colloquial overuse of “It’s me.” But you have to understand the special situation when “It’s me” is correct. At all times, it should be “It’s I.”

  1. Esq.: Do not use Mr. Jean Jorge, Esq. Always use Mr. Jean Jorge or Jean Jorge, Esq. This is overuse as Esq. and Mr. mean almost the same.
  2. Avoid usages like these. See the correct usages.

He is very generous enough to visit me – He is generous enough to visit me.

Joe asked did we go to the movie – Joe asked if we went for the movie.

Much people were present – Many people were present.

This is a worth watching movie – This is a movie worth watching.

These all students passed – All these students passed.

Sue had no any troubles – Sue had no troubles. Or Sue hadn’t any troubles.

None of the apples were ripe – None of the apples was ripe.

  1. The last one above (Negatives): The negatives should always be expressed in singular form. When we use negatives, there are not many things to consider to use a plural verb. There is not even a single thing to put even a singular verb. So, if we had anything of lower status than singular verb that is applicable to negatives. However, since we don’t have any such thing, we stick to singular verbs, and plural cannot even be considered.

None of the students has failed the exam.

Not a thing was said in the interview.

Nothing was there in his room.

Instead of sentences like “All people didn’t go,” use “No one went.”

The tip is to avoid using ‘not’ as much as possible. Instead of ‘not’ try to use words like ‘never’, ‘none’, ‘no one’, ‘nothing’, etc.

These are some of the commonest mistakes in English. I will have more of this in the coming posts. Thanks for reading the post, and please join the comments section in the blog to tell me your opinions. Since this is a quick post, I couldn’t include much of the information I planned to include. If you find errors, please let me know. (Reminding my readers that I can be a very lousy editor.)

Please find my more recent post on English Peeves, I hate (the errors in language to be avoided).

Copyright © Lenin Nair 2008


  1. Hi Mr Nair, You have an excellent writing GuideBook! Waiting to see your next post! Please correct me if there is any grammar mistakes! Thanks.

  2. Yes there is a mistake! that Mr. Nair is the mistake, I am Lenin to you and all. Thanks for the comment.

  3. A. You're not actually altogether correct in your description of subject/direct-object useage. It's actually never ok to say "It's her/him" because the syntax itself forbids it [e.g., "It is he/she" is correct). "It" in that sentence is the subject, and "her" or "him" is the direct object. Subject *always* equals I/he/she/who; direct object *always* equals me/him/her/whom. The best way to keep this rule straight is to remember that most sentences are structured this way: subject/verb[/direct object]. (You can have a complete sentence without a direct object, but not without at least one subject and at least one verb.)

    Examples (subject/verb/direct object):

    You/threw/[him]. (Whom did you throw? Who threw him? Did you throw him? Was he thrown? Who threw whom? Who was thrown? By whom was he thrown?)

    He/met/[her]. (Whom did he meet? Who met whom? Did he meet her? Was it she [whom] he met? Did she meet him? Who met him? Who met her?)

    I/called. [no direct object] (Who called? Did I call?)

    I/called/[you]. (Whom did I call? Who called you? Did I call you? Were you called by me? By whom were you called?)

    Tip: Ask yourself: 1.) Who did the action? 2.) To whom was the action done? (hint: the object of a preposition is always a direct object. In none of the above examples is there a preposition, because I wanted to keep it simple, but a VERY common mistake in English is to say/write: "between you and I," or "between he and I," etc. Can you figure out why these are incorrect? Hint 2.0: The sentence: "He and I built a wall between him and me." is correct, as is "She and he threw confetti over me and you," and "You and I jumped over him and her." Why?)

    (I'm not sure what this means: And the sentences with third person pronouns are usually not incorrectly used, since, in fact, there are subject versions and direct-object versions of English personal pronouns, except "you [for some reason]." [Also try to remember that many compound adjectives, such as the one in "third-person pronoun," need hyphenation.])

    B. "Esquire (or "Esq.")" doesn't actually mean the same thing as "Mister" or "Mr." in English -- certainly not American English. In America, the use of "Esq." is used by attorneys (the way "M.D." is used by medical doctors). While you're correct about not using both "Mr." and "Esq.", your reasoning is slightly faulty.

    C. Really, it's never okay to put a comma in place of a semicolon to separate two independent clauses, even in a short sentence. That's not good advice. If you're trying to write professionally, this will put you out of the game immediately.

  4. Anonymous:

    It's not wrong to say It's I or It's he or It's she or It's they. Absolutely not wrong....

    Here goes the references:
    AskOxford Explanation
    Wikipedia Explanation

    The same rule applies when using he or she. So they are not wrong. Also, I would like to tell you, "it's him" is not wrong either, it just depends on the context which I have described in the post clearly.

    about your example : I called him you have asked "who called?" answer should be "it's I" not "It's me" would you agree? Also, if the question is "Ann called him" who called? "It's she" correct? whom did Ann call? "It's him" agree???

    You are right about ESq. It's a title slightly above the normal Mr. But I just specified it to be almost equal to that in order to avoid using it twice. You never use them together.

    And about the last argument: "Jack ran, Jill followed." is a perfectly correct sentence. Here is explanation from Elements of Style

    The exact sentence from elements of style is "if the sentences are very short and alike in fashion, a comma is permissible." Here is the explanation. Search for the given text or example.

    The Elements of Style Chapter

    eg: Man proposes, God disposes.
    The gate swung apart, the bridge fell, the portcullis was drawn up.

    I hope I cleared your all doubts. If anything more is there, please let me know. I would like to know who this is..., Anonymous...




Post a Comment

Comments are moderated very strictly

Popular posts from this blog

Power of Short Sentences

Post dedicated to Thomas Hardy (see History Today below). There are monster sentences like the one you encounter as the first paragraph of Oliver Twist by Charles Dickens . One of my friends, whom I am getting equipped for his IELTS ( what is this? ), told me that the examination recommends long sentences. In writing classes also, I guess it’s longer sentences most tutors promote. But indubitably shorter sentences are more powerful . We will see why. Take a long sentence for instance: Tom Cruise, one of the finest actors in the whole world, is perhaps the most powerful celebrity to exist ever according to Time Magazine, but many people still dispute this fact and point out that there are more powerful and popular actors than Cruise, though they were unsuccessful in providing the total number of fans, who liked the films of those actors. This is a long sentence and it is very confusing . Though it has a logical construction and conveys a meaning, it falters in many occasions and seems

Creative Writing: Crafting Characters With Emotional Appeal in Mind

When you read the greatest fiction works ever, have you ever asked what was so compelling about them that you not only kept reading it, but you ended up reading all other major works of the writer? It may well be because the writer touched your emotional quotient quite a bit. Every reader has a unique taste . Some like to read suspense thrillers , some tender love stories, and some others dark horror and bloodshed stories . That’s why there are all sorts of genres out there. When a writer gives you what exactly you want, you will keep reading. Here we come to the emotional appeal. Character Imperfection Perfect characters may not always be the upshot of a writer’s deliberation. It may well be due to ignorance . Usually the upcoming writers take it for granted that if they create perfect characters, they will be able to garner a bigger audience . It is not true. You have to ask yourself what a character would do in a particular situation. Perfect characters—perfect gunmen, perfect

Another Tiny List of Confusables

Earlier, you may remember we published a list of confusable words . Here we are again, with such a list of words. Abjure/Adjure: Abjure means "to formally renounce (give up) something" such as a position. Adjure on the other hand means 'to appeal to' or 'solemnly order'. The governor decided to abjure his position due to political pressure. Normally, adjuring to the subordinates doesn't give many results. Amount/Number: Use amount when you have uncountable subject. Use number when it is countable. The amount of love one gets depends on the number of friends one has. Appraise/Apprise: Appraise is the word applied to quantitative evaluation of something. Apprise means 'communicate' or 'inform'. Appraising diamonds is the work of an expert. Joe apprised me of the schedule of events. Attorney/Lawyer/Solicitor: These terms are highly misinterpreted and confused by many people. Let me clarify. In the US, an attorney is any member