Skip to main content

My Pet Peeves: Mistakes in English I Hate

Hope you saw my last post on avoiding mistakes in written language. Here are some pet peeves of mine—the incorrect usages that I hate to see in English. So many people are used to these errors either in speech or in writing. Some of these errors are confined to India, my country, but certain others may be universal.

  1. Using It’s instead of Its: This is a very common mistake in English. Many are prone to this. Here, I will try to clarify where to use ‘It’s’ and where to use ‘Its’.

‘It’s’ means ‘It is’ and this usage comes whenever a subject is mentioned in the third person pronoun, it:

It’s bad to interchange ‘Its’ and ‘It’s’.

On the other hand, ‘Its’ is similar to ‘his’, ‘her’, ‘their’, ‘Tom’s’, ‘Kathy’s’ etc. This is a possessive form. Example:

The dog recovered and ate its meat.

As good writers, always make sure you use the correct form in your writing. The rule of thumb to remember is “The apostrophe always hints auxiliary verb.”

  1. Use of Only to Emphasize: This mistake is mostly in the Indian context, perhaps limited to South Indian city of Chennai. I found people using ‘Only’ to give emphasis in many contexts. For instance:

“I only purchased the equipments.” When the person actually means: “I myself purchased the equipments.”

Another more deplorable example is:

“I dropped it here only.” When the person means actually: “I dropped it here itself.”

This use of ‘only’ is highly pervasive here. Avoid such uses. ‘Only’ has several meanings according to contexts, but none of them specifies that it can be used to give emphasis. Here are some examples of the correct use of ‘only’:

Only I was present at the seminar (means I was alone).

I could only watch the cruelty (means merely watch and no action).

Only if you do this, I will do that (a condition).

She landed only last week (something that happened very recently).

He has only one girl (single something).

Do not use ‘only’ to mean anything else. Also, make sure you put ‘only’ right before the word that it modifies. For instance:

“Only I brought an umbrella” as opposed to “I only brought an umbrella” or “I brought only an umbrella.” All of these sentences are correct, but they all mean different things.

In the first sentence, no one other than I brought an umbrella. The second sentence means that I brought an umbrella but didn’t use it. The third sentence means I brought an umbrella and nothing else.

  1. Even Instead of Also: This is something that I forgot recently. Fortunately, someone here in India recently reminded me by messaging to me something similar to: “I find that you are doing this. Even I am doing the same thing.”

But what he actually meant was “I am also doing the same thing.” He used even to mean also. I found so many people are prone to this error. So, let me put this down here:

Even is used to specify the greatness of something. As in sentences:

“I couldn’t recognize even my wife.” Would you say, “I couldn’t recognize also my wife” in this context? The sentence roughly means that ‘I’ am under some great memory loss that ‘I’ couldn’t recognize ‘my wife’.

Also means ‘in addition’. “I also did the same thing” means I am one of the people who did something. On the other hand, “Even I did it” means I did something humanly not possible to me, or I achieved something great that I could not have normally.

  1. Isn’t it: Many Indians are very prone to this very error. They tend to make sentences like:

Akbar is the father of Shah Jahan, isn’t it?

Shah Rukh Khan will be the greatest Indian film star, isn’t it?

These sentences exploit the general rule of question tags. Here is my post on using question tags correctly. In these sentences, the tag ‘isn’t it’ is a universal one. Many Indians tend to feel that this is correct everywhere, but it is not so. As a substitute for ‘isn’t it’ in these sentences, you can universally use ‘isn’t it so’ as in sentences:

Akbar is father of Shah Jahan, isn’t it so?

Otherwise, on using correct question tag, the sentences would be:

Akbar is the father of Shah Jahan, isn’t he?

Shah Rukh Khan will be the greatest Indian film star, won’t he?

More of the pet peeves will be added in any of the coming posts. Please voice your comments in the comment section and let me know if you have any similar linguistic or writing peeves that you want people to know of.

Copyright © Lenin Nair 2008


  1. My dear. There's an error at the very start of your piece. You say:

    ‘It’s’ means ‘It is’ and this usage comes whenever a subject is mentioned in the third person pronoun, it:

    The dog was sick. It’s legs twitched.

    Of course, you're correct that "it's" means "it is." But look at your example. "The dog was sick. It is legs twitched." ???

  2. Dear dear Elizabeth, thanks for pointing me to this error. See? I always tell my readers that I am a very lousy editor myself. Though I give them correct usage, I make the same errors. I am the culprit here. I have just made a change to that little example.

    Dear readers, as Elizabeth has pointed out, I had made a riddddiiiiculous mistake of an example in her comment. Please let me know if you find any more of such errors. This is a recurring issue with me sadly. Elizabeth, many thanks for pointing me to that error. Thanks for reading.


  3. What about using "I" instead of "me"? "That is a picture of My Sister and __(A)___." "Harvey and __(B)____ went to the river." I was taught to use the word that fits if you take the other person away from the sentence. In which case it would be:
    A - me / B - I
    Am I correct? I see people using the wrong word all the time and I feel like asking them if they even read it in their mind before posting. :/

    1. You are absolutely correct Earthgal. If a pronoun is in the objective form in a sentence, it has to be him, me, etc. For instance, some people robbed Joseph and me. But in subjective form, it has to be I or he. Ex: Joseph and I robbed some people.


Post a Comment

Comments are moderated very strictly

Popular posts from this blog

Power of Short Sentences

Post dedicated to Thomas Hardy (see History Today below). There are monster sentences like the one you encounter as the first paragraph of Oliver Twist by Charles Dickens . One of my friends, whom I am getting equipped for his IELTS ( what is this? ), told me that the examination recommends long sentences. In writing classes also, I guess it’s longer sentences most tutors promote. But indubitably shorter sentences are more powerful . We will see why. Take a long sentence for instance: Tom Cruise, one of the finest actors in the whole world, is perhaps the most powerful celebrity to exist ever according to Time Magazine, but many people still dispute this fact and point out that there are more powerful and popular actors than Cruise, though they were unsuccessful in providing the total number of fans, who liked the films of those actors. This is a long sentence and it is very confusing . Though it has a logical construction and conveys a meaning, it falters in many occasions and seems

Creative Writing: Crafting Characters With Emotional Appeal in Mind

When you read the greatest fiction works ever, have you ever asked what was so compelling about them that you not only kept reading it, but you ended up reading all other major works of the writer? It may well be because the writer touched your emotional quotient quite a bit. Every reader has a unique taste . Some like to read suspense thrillers , some tender love stories, and some others dark horror and bloodshed stories . That’s why there are all sorts of genres out there. When a writer gives you what exactly you want, you will keep reading. Here we come to the emotional appeal. Character Imperfection Perfect characters may not always be the upshot of a writer’s deliberation. It may well be due to ignorance . Usually the upcoming writers take it for granted that if they create perfect characters, they will be able to garner a bigger audience . It is not true. You have to ask yourself what a character would do in a particular situation. Perfect characters—perfect gunmen, perfect

Another Tiny List of Confusables

Earlier, you may remember we published a list of confusable words . Here we are again, with such a list of words. Abjure/Adjure: Abjure means "to formally renounce (give up) something" such as a position. Adjure on the other hand means 'to appeal to' or 'solemnly order'. The governor decided to abjure his position due to political pressure. Normally, adjuring to the subordinates doesn't give many results. Amount/Number: Use amount when you have uncountable subject. Use number when it is countable. The amount of love one gets depends on the number of friends one has. Appraise/Apprise: Appraise is the word applied to quantitative evaluation of something. Apprise means 'communicate' or 'inform'. Appraising diamonds is the work of an expert. Joe apprised me of the schedule of events. Attorney/Lawyer/Solicitor: These terms are highly misinterpreted and confused by many people. Let me clarify. In the US, an attorney is any member